Thursday, February 25, 2021

BRADY APPLAUDS NINTH CIRCUIT COURT DECISION TO REHEAR CASE UPHOLDING CALIFORNIA'S LARGE CAPACITY MAGAZINE RESTRICTION


The Court Vacated a Decision by a Three-Judge Panel in Duncan v. Becerra to Strike Down California’s Restriction on Large Capacity Magazines

 

https://www.bradyunited.org/press-releases/ninth-circuit-court-decision-california-large-capacity-magazine-restriction

 

Washington, D.C., February 25, 2021 - Brady applauds the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for vacating the decision of a three-judge panel that struck down California’s restriction on large capacity magazines. Brady has filed two amicus briefs to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals – one in support of California’s law and a second in support of California’s petition for rehearing which was filed jointly with Team ENOUGH, March for Our Lives, Gifford’s Law Center and Everytown for Gun Safety. Today’s decision ensures that Californians again have their day in court to defend this common-sense public safety law. Brady is confident that the court will uphold this law, just as courts have upheld similar restrictions for decades.


Brady reiterates that this restriction is constitutional and does not infringe on the Second Amendment.

Brady Chief Counsel and Vice President for Legal 
Jonathan Lowy shared:

“The Constitution, properly understood, should not entitle people to weapons of war, or prevent states from prohibiting military-style firearms or the large capacity magazines they use. The Ninth Circuit was correct to review this incorrect decision, and hopefully begin to reinstate the authority of Californians to enact strong gun laws that protect them from gun violence.”

Brady Litigation and Constitutional Counsel Christa Nicols shared:

“This decision reverses last year’s damaging and ill-considered action by the court’s three-judge panel. Brady applauds the Ninth Circuit for providing Californians the opportunity to defend this common-sense public safety regulation in court. We are hopeful that the court will uphold this law.”

About California’s Large Capacity Magazine Ban:

Following high-profile mass shootings, California’s legislature enhanced the state’s longstanding restrictions on large capacity magazines. The 2016 law prohibits residents from possessing magazines with capacity to accept more than 10 rounds, subject to limited exceptions. Prior to this law going into effect, residents were required to remove such magazines from the state, to sell these magazines to a licensed firearm dealer, or to surrender these magazines to a law enforcement agency.

  

Tuesday, February 23, 2021

CALIFORNIA LAWMAKER WANTS TO OUTLAW GUN AND AMMO SHOWS ON STATE PROPERTY, FAIRGROUNDS

https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/article249441480.html

By Ryan Sabalow  February 23, 2021 05:00 AM,

{Triple Beam arrest leads to confiscation of a ghost gun outside a Fresno football game. This was one of over 120 arrests during a strategic gang enforcement effort led by the U.S. Marshals Service. By Craig Kohlruss}

A Southern California Democrat hopes Gov. Gavin Newsom will ban all guns and ammo sales on all state property, a move that would effectively end firearms shows at dozens of local fairs across the state.

Newly-elected California State Sen. Dave Min, D-Irvine, introduced SB 264, which would prohibit a state employee or operator of “state-owned property, from contracting for, authorizing, or allowing the sale of any firearm or ammunition.” The bill makes an exception for gun buy-back programs.

“The evidence is overwhelmingly clear — more guns lead to more violence,” the senator’s office said in a statement. “Gun violence splinters families and communities, and I am hopeful my colleagues will see taxpayers’ dollars have no place in funding the proliferation of gun sales and heartbreak.”

The legislation would make California the first state in the nation to prohibit gun shows at state-owned fairgrounds, and it sets the stage for yet another high-profile fight over gun regulations in a state that has over the years passed some of the most stringent gun control laws in the country, including some of the toughest regulations at gun shows.

Min’s bill follows previous legislative efforts to prohibit gun shows at individual fairgrounds, including at the Del Mar Fairgrounds in San Diego County and the Cow Palace in San Mateo County.

Gun rights activists and conservative local government leaders are gearing up for a fight in the legislature and in the courts, should Min’s bill pass. Tehama County Supervisor Bob Williams said gun shows provide a critical source of money for struggling fairgrounds.

“The fairgrounds are notoriously short of revenue every year just to try to stay in business. And to take one more thing away from them ... seems rather ridiculous to me,” Williams said.

There’s no clearinghouse for how many fairs across the state host or have hosted gun shows, nor are there any official estimates for how much money gun shows generate for local fairs. The bill applies to the 52 District Agricultural Associations that have fairgrounds across California.

State restrictions on crowd-sizes because of the COVID-19 pandemic have shuttered fairgrounds over the last year, making it even more difficult to come up with a tally. Meanwhile, one of the largest venues for gun shows, Cal Expo in Sacramento, hasn’t hosted a gun show at the state fairgrounds in at least three years, officials said.

The Western Fairs Association didn’t return messages seeking comment.

In one of the previous bills that sought to prohibit gun shows at the Cow Palace, opponents said canceling the shows would cut revenues by more than $730,000, and the annual loss in sales tax revenue would top $600,000. Gun shows at a fairground Orange County account for $715,000 in revenue.

Min’s bill would likely prove illegal if it passes both legislative chambers and Gov. Newsom signs it, said Sam Paredes, the executive director of Gun Owners of California.

“You can’t ban legal activities at publicly-owned facilities,” he said.

Brown, Schwarzenegger vetoed gun show bills

SB 264 may be the first legislative effort to ban gun shows at fairs statewide, but other efforts focused on prohibiting the shows at individual fairs have been a regular point of contention in the California legislature since Schwarzenegger’s term.

In 2009, Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill that would have eventually prohibited gun shows at the Cow Palace.  In his veto message, Schwarzenegger argued that the bill banning guns at one facility but not at dozens of others around California “set a confusing precedent” and “would result in decreased state and local tax revenues by restricting events at the Cow Palace.”

Four years later, Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed another bill that sought to have supervisors of both San Mateo County and neighboring San Francisco County approve gun shows at the Cow Palace.

In his veto message, Brown argued the bill “pre-empts the Board of Directors of the Cow Palace from exercising its contracting authority whenever a gun show is involved. I prefer to leave these decisions to the sound discretion of the Board.” Brown vetoed a similar bill in 2018, citing similar arguments. Local fair board directors are gubernatorial appointees.

The Cow Palace board of directors later decided to stop hosting the gun shows in 2020.

Opponents of gun shows waited until Brown was out of office before advancing their next attempt at tackling gun shows on state property.

In 2019, Newsom signed San Diego Democrat Assemblyman Todd Gloria’s Assembly Bill 893, which prohibited gun shows at the Del Mar fairgrounds beginning this year.

Gloria’s bill followed the Del Mar fair board in 2018 voting after the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Florida to suspend the following year its popular Crossroads of The West Gun Shows, five of which were held at the fairground each year.

The private company that put on the shows filed a lawsuit to block the board’s decision. Last year, the board signed a settlement with the company that awarded the gun show operators $500,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs.

At the time, Crossroads of The West Gun Shows promised to use the money to fight to overturn AB 893, which took effect Jan. 1.

No Crossroads of The West gun shows are listed as scheduled at the Del Mar fairgrounds on the company’s website. A message for the company wasn’t returned Monday.

Prior to the pandemic, California was estimated to be home to 4.2 million gun owners and another 3.1 million adults who live with them. Gun rights groups say more than 1 million Californians became new gun owners last year, mirroring a national surge in firearm sales.

Other bill bans ‘ghost gun’ parts

California was one of the states to first aggressively regulate sales at gun shows.

In 1999, California enacted the nation’s strongest gun show oversight rules. California requires that all gun sellers at a gun show obtain a certificate of eligibility from the state Department of Justice following a background check. Promoters also are required to have security plans, carry $1 million in liability insurance, and prohibit anyone under 18 from entering a show without a legal guardian.

California requires background checks for all firearm sales and transfers at the shows under the same process at a traditional storefront gun retailer.

Gun control advocates have pointed to studies that show California’s regulations may be more effective at preventing gun violence than at other less-regulated states.

The Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence cited one study that measured an increase in firearm deaths and injuries in California communities within driving distance of Nevada gun shows, a state where there are no explicit regulations on gun shows.

“By contrast, researchers measured no increase in gun deaths or injuries following gun shows in California, where there are multiple laws that govern gun show sales,” the gun-control group’s website says. “These results suggest that California’s gun show regulations may help to deter illicit firearm use.”

SB 264, which has yet to receive a formal hearing, isn’t the only gun-show-related bill that state lawmakers will hear this year.

Assembly Bill 311 by Assemblyman Christopher Ward, D-San Diego, would prohibit gun show retailers from possessing or selling what are called “firearm precursor parts,” used in do-it-yourself kits to assemble homemade weapons.

Gun control advocates say these so-called “ghost gun” parts lack serial numbers to trace ownership, making it difficult for law enforcement to keep track of them, and they’ve been used in some high-profile murders.

Law enforcement officials said Rancho Tehama gunman Kevin Janson Neal made at least two of his weapons, including an illegally modified Bushmaster AR-15 assault rifle, out of mail-order parts before his 2017 shooting rampage in the Tehama County town killing five people before he shot himself.

Sacramento Police Officer Tara O’Sullivan allegedly was murdered in 2019 by Adel Sambrano Ramos, who faces charges of illegally making two AR-15 style rifles and of converting three other AR-15 style semi-automatic rifles into machine guns.

Gun rights groups say Newsom already signed legislation that would address the issue.

In 2019, the governor signed a bill that will require in 2025 precursor parts to be treated the same as regular firearms, and be sold only through a dealer and with a background check.


New legislation would make California the first state in the nation to prohibit gun shows at state-owned fairgrounds. Lynne Sladky AP



Ryan Sabalow covers environment, general news and enterprise and investigative stories for McClatchy’s Western newspapers. Before joining The Bee in 2015, he was a reporter at The Auburn Journal, The Redding Record Searchlight and The Indianapolis Star. 

Monday, February 8, 2021

BRADY CA CALLS ON SCHOOLS TO EDUCATE FAMILIES ON FIREARM STORAGE

LEGISLATION INTRODUCED BY ASSEMBLYMEMBER LAURA FRIEDMAN

 COULD REDUCE INCIDENTS OF FAMILY FIRE IN CALIFORNIA


HTTPS://WWW.BRADYUNITED.ORG/PRESS-RELEASES/CALIFORNIA-SCHOOL-RESOURCES-BILL-FIREARM-STORAGE

Washington, D.C., February 8, 2021 - Brady applauds the introduction of AB 452 by Assemblymember Laura Friedman (D-Glendale) and urges the California Legislature to pass this important bill. AB 452 would require the Department of Education and the Department of Justice to work with California schools on notifying families about the state’s safe gun storage laws. Especially while children are confined at home during the COVID-19 pandemic, ensuring families have the information they need to safely store firearms could curb incidents of family fire - shootings involving improperly stored or misused guns in the home.

This legislation will reduce unintentional shootings among children, youth suicides by firearm, and school shootings. The bill will save lives. Brady calls on the California Legislature to pass AB 452 without delay.

Brady President Kris Brown shared:

“Schools and educators are vital partners in the effort to prevent unintentional shootings in the home, part of what’s known as family fire. Nationwide, more than 4 million children live in homes with access to unlocked or unsupervised guns, while eight children or teens are injured or killed in unintentional shootings every day. This bill will help to provide California families with information about the dangers that can result from unsafe firearm practices in the home.

Brady is grateful to Assemblymember Friedman for her work in championing this needed policy. All Californians, and especially the state’s children, will be safer because of this bill and we urge the California Legislature to pass it at once."

Brady California Legislative Chair and former school board member of the Ready Springs Union Elementary School District, Amanda Wilcox shared:

“As we enter another year of lockdown orders from the coronavirus pandemic, millions of children continue to spend increased time in homes where guns are improperly stored. We owe it to our children, and all Californians, to protect them from incidents of family fire. AB 452 is a necessary step to save lives and reduce the major impact family fire has on America’s gun violence epidemic.”

Team Enough Executive Councilmember Stephan Abrams shared:

“Schools are an essential partner and often untapped resource in the effort to prevent unintentional shootings and reduce gun violence. As a California resident and current student, school resources are an important information source for us and our families. This bill will save lives by helping schools and parents to avail themselves of these materials on safe storage and gun safety. It is a common-sense bill and we are proud to support Assemblymember Friedman in the effort to ensure it becomes law.”

About AB 452:

Introduced by Assemblymember Laura Friedman, AB 452 requires all public and private schools in California to inform parents and guardians of California’s child access prevention and safe firearm storage laws at the beginning of each semester or quarter.

About Family Fire

Family fire is a shooting involving an improperly stored or misused gun in the home that results in death or injury. Every day, 8 children and teens are unintentionally injured or killed due to an unlocked or unsupervised gun in the home. 63 people a day die by gun suicide. When someone attempts suicide with a gun, they rarely get a second chance to live a full life. Unintentional shootings, suicide, and intentional shootings are all forms of family fire.

Fast Facts About Family Fire:

4.6 million children live in homes with access to an unlocked or unsupervised gun

Over 70% of kids know where that gun is stored in their home

One study showed that 1 in 5 parents who said their child never handled guns without supervision were contradicted by their child’s reports

Access to guns in the home increases the risk of suicide by 300%.

75% of school shootings are facilitated by kids having access to unsecured and/or unsupervised guns at home.

For more information: https://www.bradyunited.org/program/end-family-fire


Friday, February 5, 2021

BRADY CONDEMNS VIRGINIA SENATE FOR FAILING TO PASS A BILL PROHIBITING DOMESTIC ABUSERS FROM POSSESSING FIREARMS

https://www.bradyunited.org/press-releases/virginia-senate-fails-to-pass-domestic-abusers-prohibitor

 

Washington, D.C., February 4, 2021 - Today Brady expresses profound disappointment in the Virginia Senate after it has failed to pass SB 1382, a bill that would have prohibited abusers convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors from purchasing and possessing a firearm. Without this bill, individuals in Virginia who are convicted of domestic abuse are able to continue possessing their firearms despite being prohibited by federal law and can even purchase more guns via private sales that are not subject to federal background checks. This bill would have empowered law enforcement to remove these weapons and disarm these convicted abusers.

Brady President Kris Brown shared:

“The people of Virginia have demanded common-sense gun violence prevention laws to keep our Commonwealth safe. This bill, prohibiting convicted domestic abusers from purchasing a firearm, is such a bill. It is unfathomable that members of the Virginia Senate believe that these individuals should retain their firearms when it is a fact that a gun in a home with a history of domestic violence increases the risk of homicide by 500 percent. A woman is shot and killed by a former or current partner roughly every 16 hours in the United States. This bill would save lives. Shame on the Virginia Senate for failing to take action to keep our families safe.”

Author and activist Kate Ranta shared:

"As a domestic and gun violence survivor who was almost killed with 9mm Beretta at the hands of my violent ex-husband, and as someone who deeply believes abusers should not be able to have guns, I am angry and disappointed that the Virginia Senate failed to pass this bill. It makes no sense. Why would we ever want violent abusers to remain armed? Women and children are dying and the Senate has failed to take action to protect them."

About SB 1382:

SB 1382 - This bill would prohibit those convicted of the assault and battery of a family or household member from purchasing, possessing, or transporting a firearm.

Facts About Guns and Domestic Violence in the United States:

·       About every 16 hours, a woman is shot and killed by a former or current partner;

·       54 percent of mass shootings are related to domestic or family violence;

·       Women who were killed by a spouse, intimate partner, or close relative were 7 times more likely to have lived in homes with guns;

·       1 out of every 15 children in the U.S. is exposed to the effects of intimate partner violence yearly; and

·       When there is a gun in a home with a history of domestic violence, there is a 500% higher chance that a woman will be murdered.